Daniel Lehnberg
Daniel Lehnberg
@antiochp feel free to edit/update as you see fit, just put something in there
Thanks for raising @paouky. :+1: It might be helpful to describe a bit better where the confusion arises, and what alternatives there might be to a name change. Whenever I...
Yes, thanks for that, I think it does. :+1: I do worry less about alternative implementations - it's straight forward for these to have a distinct name for their repos...
Relevant forum thread: https://www.grin-forum.org/t/bls-signatures-implementation-from-chia/609 > Can you point me to how this can be achieved in an non-interactive way. @GandalfThePink see here https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/483
Ditto. @GandalfThePink, for deeper scrutiny, you might want to consider posting the paper to the [MW mailing list](https://lists.launchpad.net/mimblewimble/).
Good primer: https://gist.github.com/hermanjunge/3308fbd3627033fc8d8ca0dd50809844
Question related to BLS standardisation asked in Chia's dev channel on keybase: > lehnberg > 2:05 PM - 11 Dec > Hello all! Are Chia involved in the attempts to...
https://hackmd.io/@benjaminion/H1lkISO3JU BLS12-381 For The Rest Of Us
Glad the writing triggered this thinking! Initially, I like it as well. > instead of tracking timestamps for txs in the stempool, track the current block height when we see...
> I think we lose a lot of the simplicity here if we then re-introduce a timer/delay. > I'm not sure the benefits would outweigh the complexity. Yeah, I think...