Lakshay Rohila

Sorry, the last commit was wrong branch. I have reverted that commit.

> Same comment as: #4242 This conky-gtk version is incompatible with the previous version. So, IMHO, adding this into older repos also containing the older conky-gtk will be a confusion...

@peabee, I've also created a pet package for this package, which I suppose @techrockedge already has included in his F96-CE_4. Just that there are some additional changes here which currently...

@peabee, if you're not busy, I'd love that you respond to this PR. If petbuilds is the wrong format, please inform me; I'll try to get that PET added and...

> Please consider whether one of the Ubuntu Jammy packages can meet your requirements: https://pkgs.org/search/?q=conky conky-all_1.12.2-1_amd64.deb highly configurable system monitor (all features enabled) conky-cli_1.12.2-1_amd64.deb highly configurable system monitor (basic version)...

@peabee, I've started this thread for this `conky-gtk` version: https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic.php?t=10679. The pet is located on the page. The only problem is that the name I use for this application in...

@peabee, I have rebuilt the archive. Here it is: [Conky_GTK-lua_1.0.pet.fake.gz](https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/files/14613092/Conky_GTK-lua_1.0.pet.fake.gz) _(Remove the `.fake.gz`)_ I have also renamed the application name & version in `pet.specs` to the format recommended by `dir2pet`...

@peabee, Please add this https://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pet_packages-jammy64/ and I'll create a new PR adding it. Closing this PR.

> > The pet is located on the page. The only problem is that the name I use for this application in `pet.specs` is `Conky-GTK_lua-1.0` (lua meaning it is compatible...

@peabee, I see you've added https://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/pet_packages-jammy64/Conky_GTK_2024-2.0.pet. I suppose you must have also changed the `pet.specs`, right? Because the name I put in this `pet.specs` file was `Conky_GTK-lua_1.0`.