kylincaster

Dear all， I already developed a multi-user version at only for cpu-only at [task-spooler](https://github.com/kylincaster/task-spooler/tree/cpu-only) If you feel interesting or useful, maybe we could try to merge it back. However, I...

> > > Dear all， > > I already developed a multi-user version at only for cpu-only at [task-spooler](https://github.com/kylincaster/task-spooler/tree/cpu-only) > > If you feel interesting or useful, maybe we could...

> Hey @kylincaster. You made a PR in your fork. Could you please make the PR again in [here](https://github.com/justanhduc/task-spooler/pulls)? Ok, I have done with the full detail about the feature/bug...

@justanhduc I found if i wanted to precisely control the task, the PID of all subprocessors needed to be known in advance. So I use a bash script to control...

Hi, @justanhduc, I mean to pause or kill a process by ts. not only the process itself, but also all subprocesses should be handled. So a revursive code is necessary...

Hi @justanhduc I ever try to `kill` the process directly. Unfortunately, the **stop** signal is not compatible for task with the subprocesses. The following is the example script which cannot...

Thanks for @justanhduc's comments on the performance of **mpirun**. Unfortunately, it depends on the implementation of **MPI**. The intel mpi processes didn't forwards such signal. So my solution to this...

Thank you for your detailed feedback on my modifications. My goal is to create a user-friendly Python interface `find_misc`. I plan to enhance the Python bindings further. By the way,...

> You might try replacing `fib` with a `ccall` invocation. Thank you for your reply. I have tried the `@ccall` macro, which invokes a dynamic link with the external library....