Kyle Knoepfel

What is the status of this PR? I have no immediate need for using more than 10 ports, but for the sake of the website documentation (and just for maintainability...

I've run into needing this feature as well, and am planning on using the same solution that @Lawrencemm proposed above in the meantime. If I were to create a PR...

@alalazo, ... well ... I think simple strings are insufficient (and inconvenient!) as there's already precedent for something more powerful (like `self.prefix` in many of the package recipes). I am...

@alalazo, maybe I'm not understanding you, but are you saying you're okay with the API inconsistency between `self.build_directory` and `self.prefix`? As a user, I am not okay with that--it means...

> > I'm not understanding you, but are you saying you're okay with the API inconsistency between self.build_directory and self.prefix? > > At the moment yes. Also note: > >...

@becker33, @alecbcs, or @tgamblin: I'd like to get some direction on what to do with this PR. I can think of at least three options: 1. Discard this PR and...

> However we're about to cut the release for ISC and this could introduce bugs late in the release process due to the API change, my vote would be to...

> Since #42483 the self-referential dependencies are discouraged and I think flagged in audit. @alalazo may be able to tell us why. Oh, sad! I'm all for efficiency, but if...

What is the status of this PR?

@kboyarinov, thanks for reaching out. I have been using oneTBB flow for a while, and have greatly enjoyed it. One of the use cases I have is that some algorithms/nodes...