Paul Natsuo Kishimoto

Comments but no preferences: - Write tests for the unusual cases described in the OP. - About the IAMC format, my only thought is there should be a spec of...

> > About the IAMC format, my only thought is there should be a spec of what is required, suggested, and optional. > > My immediate gut reaction is that...

> I would suggest putting them in ixmp to minimize maintenance overlaps between the two. Hm, I might disagree. At the moment ixmp does not have a dependency on pyam...

Removing the milestone entirely, as this appears to be inactive.

> There is a believed to be correctly working version on [this branch](https://github.com/behnam-zakeri/message_ix/tree/test-add-year/message_ix/tools/add_year). > > @khaeru can you please outline the steps necessary to implement the eventual solution? That branch...

> results in misaligned `input`, `output` and `technical_lifetime` parameters What specifically characterizes "aligned"? How specifically are data in the resulting scenarios "misaligned"? > believed to be correctly working version What...

This is also linked to #254: the functionality to shift the first model year is currently embedded in the Java code of the ixmp JDBCBackend. This is both a "stack...

I've relabeled this. While it _is_ an intuitive and straightforward thing to expect given the brief/vague description of this argument, the docs also don't promise that this should happen, it's...

In order to diagnose this issue, please: - Give the output of `message-ix show-versions`. - Attach the file MESSAGE_run.lst from the directory that contains the model files you are using.

> [MESSAGE_run.zip](https://github.com/iiasa/message_ix/files/5474011/MESSAGE_run.zip) > > The LST file was not supported so I included it in a zip file. Thanks! The relevant lines appear to be the ones I've extracted below,...