Kevin

Thanks for the update Darnell. I updated train_test_split_micrographs.py but now I get a new error. In fact, I get two different errors when running on two different datasets, both of...

Ah, the micrographs are float16 (mode 12?). When I check the header, it says Data Type............................... Unknown I'm not sure how to convert them, so I reprocessed a subset of...

Thanks Darnell, I've confirmed it's an incompatibility between the cryosparc wrapper and topaz > 0.2.5

Cryosparc is choosing the optimal model from training here. The columns are tab delimited: ``` kjude@sr25-cbeb955199 J121 % head train_test_curve.txt epoch iter split loss precision adjusted_precision tpr fpr auprc 1...

Aha, we need more than 10 lines to find the problem. There's an extra tab in the test rows: ``` 1 5000 train 0.17078656379618207 0.20235150884529104 0.20207595073065834 0.4041571617126465 0.06476200371980667 - 1...

I don't see anything in the cryosparc wrapper that touches the output file. I'm running a test from the command line to see if I can replicate it.

Confirmed, I get the same result running from the command line: ``` 1 4998 train 0.20054735872684065 0.2077430198754336 0.20409406537330482 0.3529072105884552 0.07785971462726593 - 1 4999 train 0.166635723940751 0.21638158779379574 0.21258089899360702 0.415122389793396 0.07393530011177063 -...