Luke Parker

Yep. I'm idiotic. Never mind then... Feature request to timeout/have an invalid version message?

1) TX extra, under Seraphis, will become solely for arbitrary data already. This would be the perfect time to remove it. 2) Removing it may be one of the worst...

No. They have to be signed, tied to a transaction, and practical flow operates on the 10th block, not the mempool. While signed memos could be separate, increasing bandwidth and...

Thanks for the corrections, @tevador. I also only assumed 30-bytes per using my above 3-output example, yet earlier assumed 96 (which you noted was wrong. I was thinking because of...

Any thoughts on removing it for steganography or a mandatory inclusion?

You actually can't, easily, commit to arbitrary data shared off chain.To discuss my specific use case: - We can't have people post it on the L2 as it would cost...

Swaps wasn't referring to atomic swaps, yet multisig-based DEXs which have a large threshold multisig (so also not like Bisq). Funds are sent to the multisig, trusting it to execute,...

> You actually can't, easily, commit to arbitrary data shared off chain.To discuss my specific use case: > - We can't have people post it on the L2 as it...

... from my perspective, I'd disagree. While yes, it is an additional burden on Monero, we're discussing ~100 bytes on relevant TXs. While I'll agree there are better solutions for...

*steganographied data can be encrypted so they do have uniform bytes and do appear indistinguishable. The sole disadvantage is the less efficient encoding combined with the processing costs. Considering we're...