Maxime L

good idea

This could be very useful, but the name needs to be revised. Alternatively, why not modify the blockbreak event so that it can be called here?

> Really BlockBreakEvent itself is mis-named (it should be PlayerBlockBreakEvent). > > Removal of support isn't the only case in which a block will get destroyed without a player present....

> > > Really BlockBreakEvent itself is mis-named (it should be PlayerBlockBreakEvent). > > > Removal of support isn't the only case in which a block will get destroyed without...

same > Any fix? > >