Ivan Kavalerov
Ivan Kavalerov
Hi! Ivan from the Product team at Ably here. Thanks for flagging this up - this is not something we are working on right now, but it is on our...
I'd like to take this on if everyone is ok with this :)
@tbedford @QuintinWillison Do we have any standardised README structure yet? If no - it looks like it may be a good chance to kick start this. cc: @AndyNicks
Additional option can be Ractor which is a part of Ruby 3.0 (https://ruby-doc.org/core-3.0.0/Ractor.html) I am wondering if we can slightly change the title of this issue to something like "Consider...
@tbedford can you please pick this up?
> SDK's shouldn't just limit interfacing with respect to ably spec, rather it can include documentation about all related specs (in this case, MQTT spec), that expose interfaces and help...
I agree that we need more documentation, I just don't think it should belong to the readme's of Ably SDKs as it has nothing to do with those SDKs, and...
> Maybe it should be worth mentioning, SDK' use websocket protocol, for using MQTT protocol, visit this link Exactly
I think this is more than just SDK - it actually involves the documentation to addon as well (i.e. its web dashboard).
Out of curiosity - if we were to make a decision where content like this should live, would it be within the docs or somewhere else? I think the right...