Daniel M. Katz

Results 32 comments of Daniel M. Katz

Friendly ping :)

Hey Bob - Thanks for this sizable contribution! We really appreciate the work. > This PR also adds the OIDC provider, though I don't personally have a good generic OIDC...

> Hey, sorry about delay on this. Was fully occupied w/ KubeCon stuff for a bit. I expect I should be able to tackle the review comments within the next...

Hey Bob - Thanks for these changes. I just got back from some time off; going to look at this now.

Hey all - I've been looking into this for the past couple of days. It sounds like what is needed for the Kubernetes Dashboard is as follows: * Retain the...

Looks like pypa/pipfile#57 has been abandoned - Would it be worth revisiting this under that assumption, or was that PR an absolute blocker?

Friendly ping :) Btw, looks like the Github tooling Greg mentioned (hi Greg! 👋) is live [since January](https://github.com/github/renaming/commit/040636ea50e945875c70cc964d586f645e9bd810).

Hey @tambry ! Thanks for the bug report. > [This](https://github.com/bloomberg/clang-p2996/blob/843fd93cfa1da4e493815f48d1a4d8a7d9bb6470/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp#L616) check should check `LangOpts.Blocks` instead. Agreed. > OpenMP pragmas use syntax such as `+:argv[0][:1]` I'm aware of the OpenMP case,...

No worries - I've adopted your suggested `LangOpts.Blocks` change. For the time being, I'll change this issue name to reflect the uncertain conflict with OpenMP, and will seek further clarification.

We'll be adopting a different syntax for P2996, likely in the next (R6) revision.