kashish2710

Hi! I can work on updating the related CSS math function pages (atan(), asin(), acos()) to clarify angle wording and avoid mixing radians/degrees terminology, similar to the atan2() fix.

“I have updated the commit addressing the Vertical toolbar section issue (#42399). Please review the changes.”

Hi! This PR clarifies the return value wording for atan(), asin(), and acos() by consistently describing the result as an , as discussed in #42283. Please let me know if...

Thanks for the review! The unrelated requestAnimationFrame change has now been reverted from this PR, and the conflict is resolved. Appreciate your guidance.

The test is intentionally minimal to clearly reproduce the issue. I can adapt it to the Boost test framework if preferred.

Hi @ Boost Geometry team, This PR adds a note under the [heading Strategies] section of the buffer documentation to clarify that the buffer algorithm expects polygons to be counter-clockwise....

Thank you for the clarification and the reference. Since the note I added is incorrect, I will close this PR. Thanks again for pointing this out.

I tested this issue with Boost 1.89 in a Colab environment: - Boost version: 1.89 (confirmed via `boost/version.hpp`) - Environment: Google Colab Linux (GCC) - Result: `Intersection count: 1` (false-positive)...