Yannick PÉROUX
Yannick PÉROUX
I'm experiencing the same issue. Did you find a solution ?
It makes perfect sense, go for it :smile: .
Hi! Thank you for your suggestion. For this kind of integrations, we prefer to encourage third parties. We try not to add too many external dependencies to Watson in order...
:+1: for adding messages to frames. This is actually something that Watson was doing in its first days, and then I removed it in order to focus more on tags....
You're right it would be better on the `stop` command :+1: .
I'll try to implement those messages as soon as I have some time. In the mean time, if someone else wants to try to give it a shot, go ahead...
Another solution would be for your script to always generate the same ID for a given frame. This is possible using a UUID v3 or v5: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universally_unique_identifier#Versions_3_and_5_(namespace_name-based)
Actually I don't think that our current format (`ỲYYY-MM-DD`, which is arrow's default one) is very relevant. Maybe we should think about something more flexible or natural?
For example git is pretty versatile, it accepts things like "yesterday", "1 week ago" or "15/04/2015" for `git log --since`. I can't find the reference anywhere though.
[parsedatetime](https://github.com/bear/parsedatetime) might be a good option (thx @jmaupetit).