judober
judober
I tried again with the new releases. With `add DoubleFloats #v1.1.22` I get the same error for my original example. With `add DoubleFloats #v1.1.23` I get ```julia ERROR: MethodError: no...
I get a similar error with ``` MethodError: no method matching isconstant(::DynamicPolynomials.Polynomial{true, Float64}) ``` However, I cannont reproduce it reliable. I occurs in the tests of my package but not...
Yes, this disables the predefined preamble but the PGFPlotsX.CUSTOM_PREAMBLE is not used as well.
Sorry, I didn't read your comment clearly. I used the option `include_preamble=false` for pgfsave. I will try your suggestion.
Ok, I tried the following: ``` Pre = "My preamble" push!(PGFPlotsX.CUSTOM_PREAMBLE, Pre) td = TikzDocument(; use_default_preamble = false) push!(td, ax) #ax is the axis object pgfsave("name.tex", td) ``` The result...
Ok, now I'm doing: ``` td = TikzDocument(; use_default_preamble = false, preamble = [Pre]) ``` which is almost what I want except for ``` \RequirePackage{luatex85} \documentclass[tikz]{standalone} ``` at the beginning...
Well actually you are right, this is probably the easiest solution. I somehow thought that using build in methods would be beneficial. My usecase: - I want to specify magical...
I have the same problem on the xaxis. Is this behaviour intended?
You are right uF is far mor common. However there are big capacitors, e.g. [this one](https://www.mouser.de/ProductDetail/KEMET/FR0H223ZF?qs=BenOyfdfArq0Z6pH0sKNnA%3D%3D). So I would suggest to add this abbreviation .
I think this one can be closed. Thanks again!