Jorge Bay
Jorge Bay
+1 It would be really nice to have, to avoid changing the template just for the title...
@bitcloud hey! so good to see you here again! Sorry for the delay in my answer, I didn't have time allotted to this project. I think the `RetryPolicy` was conceived...
oh good one, thanks for the patch! I've created a ticket to track this: https://datastax-oss.atlassian.net/browse/NODEJS-553 I would like to include it in the upcoming release (in the next few days...
Now that I think about it (after your post in the mailing list), I think supporting `CONTAINS` operator without secondary indexes doesn't make much sense, the only other way to...
glad to hear! yeah, let's keep this one open.
I think the code you shared will allow connecting to a single node, as the rest of the nodes have different server names.
Shouldn't `atomic` operations be better suited for this use case?
I've created a ticket on corefx: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/27090
@chris-ramon Do you have some time to review this PR? What can I do to help getting this patch merged?
We've been using this fix for the past week and works perfectly. The fix is straightforward and provides good coverage. Is there anything I can do to help land this?