jones-matt
jones-matt
I agree with suggestion to add in 1360 and 1370 and leaving 1353 as is (or modifying the description to Forestry, General) Moving 1354, 1355 and 1356 logically makes sense,...
Good point @benhayes21 - yes that makes sense.
In terms of the building type occupancy changes I think that adding in duplication / suggesting the deprecation of BuildingType is a large enough change to warrant Steering Group comment...
Model vendors and users may already be using the BuildingType field so I think deprecating it is a large enough change to OED to warrant Steering Group comment (even if...
Thanks. I think we should probably keep BuildingType but remove the BuildingType codes that now cause duplication given the additional occupancies in 2.3.0. The remaining remaining type codes would act...
For **Transport** suggest not adding new occupancy codes but varying description of 1250 and 1251 slightly if needed. **IFM** codes are typically used to refer to larger, higher quality, well...
@MattDonovan82 we can discuss this, but I don't think this should block incorporation as there are plenty of other GeogSchemes in the OED spec which aren't 'open'. Can we change...