Jakub Marsik

Hello @gavanderhoorn, is there any reason why this PR is still not merged? Could we perhaps help with it? What is missing? Of course the first step would be to...

Ok, I understand, I have also looked at the code and you are right. Maybe we can help with that in the coming days. What would be the best approach?...

Ok, no problem. Feel free to let me know here if we can help in any way. We will definitely try the changes now and then again with a more...

> @jmarsik: [kinetic-devel...gavanderhoorn:rebased_two_arms_on_a_rail](https://github.com/ros-industrial/motoman/compare/kinetic-devel...gavanderhoorn:rebased_two_arms_on_a_rail) is I believe the minimum set of changes needed to resolve the `LOST` goal problem for setups like yours. > > Those changes are from #179, but...

> > @jmarsik: [kinetic-devel...gavanderhoorn:rebased_two_arms_on_a_rail](https://github.com/ros-industrial/motoman/compare/kinetic-devel...gavanderhoorn:rebased_two_arms_on_a_rail) is I believe the minimum set of changes needed to resolve the `LOST` goal problem for setups like yours. > > Those changes are from #179,...

If you need message definitions for them (.msg files), you can split the .action file by `--` lines and artificially create 3 .msg files with corresponding suffixes. But it's a...

Is this change something that requires discussion (I can imagine that someone can have problems with AppDaemon having access to more and more things) or is it a no-brainer?

Anyone? Seems to be a small change, only concern could be security... In the meantime I'm running the modified version for some time without any problems, feeding some images back...

Bump @jpraus @jiripraus

> Another option could be to migrate from `rmw_microxrcedds` (and the micro-ROS Agent) to a full DDS based RMW. > > This could quite complex, as we'd need to be...