jm18919
jm18919
@baiguoname hi, is this feature still able to be merged? Really looking forward to see it.
Is it ok for me to take over this PR and make it mergable? @baiguoname @andrei-ng
> > Is it ok for me to take over this PR and make it mergable? @baiguoname @andrei-ng > > Sorry for late reply. Yes, it's ok for me. Thx....
I am not so sure how to link the conflict-resolve PR to this one....
@baiguoname can you merge my branch into your PR branch?
@baiguoname I just update my branch to fix some CI issues. Can you approve it?
I am not so sure but as I remember barter supports adding instrument on the fly? How about I submit a PR making IndexedInstruments dynamic?
https://deepwiki.com/search/the-current-implementation-fee_6ea3a56e-2bf7-460a-9137-611936e4b979 Here is a session with DeepWiki, which describes the issue and potential solutions.
I found this conflict with dependency analysis. I am not so sure. How about upgrading mybatisplus? https://github.com/naijim/seatunnel-web check this repo. I just upgraded mybatisplus. It looks like the conflict has...
https://github.com/apache/seatunnel-web/pull/292 Here is the PR. There is still some issues. I can not choose data source while testing mysql-jdbc.