Jim Nelin
Jim Nelin
I really vote for this aswell, we (as an organization) actually started demo:ing linguard for our WG-deployments, with *GREAT* success so far. Please let me know if there's anything we...
My boss and colleagues agrees by the way - we're missing (or rather want/need to extend) lingaurd a bit - but otherwise the entire company loves the software and the...
Note that i'm adding both subnets and a list of IPs (/32s), having them in a "template" or / and auto-completed from previous peers would be best i think.
Tunnel all traffic for the public internet over WG (exclude any/all local network subnets) EDIT: CORRECTED 2021-11-22: `AllowedIPs = 1.0.0.0/8, 2.0.0.0/7, 4.0.0.0/6, 8.0.0.0/7, 11.0.0.0/8, 12.0.0.0/6, 16.0.0.0/4, 32.0.0.0/3, 64.0.0.0/3, 96.0.0.0/4, 112.0.0.0/5,...
Huh? The problem? It's not really a problem, more of an enhancement with more features (such as autocompletion of input subnets, common ones/previously used ones for instance).... ? But yeah...
Same issue I'm having currently, investigating...
Can confirm this issue too.