James Hooker

Also interested in this. Looks like the implementation is pretty much there now....Some minor points around aesthetics (formatting/spelling) but apart from that looks like it's pretty much there. Wondering what...

Ah right, you're working on the slow start vs congestion avoidance piece. Gotcha, thanks for the insight!

CouchbaseMock does work with the v 2+ api. I was fighting with the TimeoutException myself. I started debugging by running: org.couchbase.mock.clientv2.ClientTest.java (in the test package of CouchbaseMock). That proved that...

Reading back over the previous comments on the ticket - it now appears to me that the fix is NOT to do bootstrapCarrierEnabled(false), but instead of that, leave it set...

Looking in core-io I see the constant.... BOOTSTRAP_CARRIER_DIRECT_PORT = 11210 I'm guessing that CouchbaseMock is not respecting this. I'm guessing CouchbaseMock is using a dynamically assigned port, hence this issue...

Thanks for the feedback @mnunberg. Couple-o-thoughts on your thoughts.... You guys running server/mock on same host - you still can if you use bootstrapCarrierDirectPort = 0. That would break existing...

OK, new approach - see pull request: https://github.com/couchbase/CouchbaseMock/pull/20 That let's us support the dynamic ports in a more graceful way. We can then get the carrier port from the mock...

The new client does not seem to support the card reader API. Wondering what the story is there? Is that deprecated or has it been replaced by something else we...