jeanPerier
jeanPerier
> we should have a little database of distinct messages Do you mean something like flang error message tables [errtxt](https://github.com/flang-compiler/flang/blob/c82148884626fece6a752040c68ab6d3ce148d18/runtime/flang/error.c) and [kanjitxt](https://github.com/flang-compiler/flang/blob/c82148884626fece6a752040c68ab6d3ce148d18/runtime/flang/kanjidf.h) ? Would you have all messages in such...
> Should we have any other kinds of messages? For example, a message attached to another message to provide context might be distinguished from stand-alone messages that provide information about...
To answer @ceseo related question (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63319#issue-1757637279), the feature has been implemented in HLFIR (but pop2_s is still blocked in HLFIR with a TODO about user defined assignment, I am currently...
Hi, thanks for reporting the issue, it is exiting to see flang being tested on new platforms (I am not aware RISC-V was already tested) ! I am not familiar...
Yes, 18.3.6 point 2, (4) about BIND(C) is not respected by lowering: "any scalar dummy argument with the VALUE attribute is interoperable with the corresponding formal parameter of the prototype"....
> @jeanPerier is there an option to generate the math dialect (https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/Dialects/MathOps/) operations for intrinsics? No, when we started lowering the intrinsics, it was not clear if MLIR real types...
Hi, I have just rebased fir-dev on LLVM 85bf221f204eafc1142a064f1650ffa9d9e03dad from last week. That means you will need to update this PR with the rebased fir-dev. You cannot simply rebase your...
Hi @rofirrim , thanks for the bug report. Lowering does not claim F2003 support, but semantics should be able to deal with up to F2018, so that is definitely a...
**Quick analysis:** - Isn't IEEE_SUPPORT_FLAG F2003 ? - The TODO is legit from a pure lowering point of view. Semantics is resolving IEEE_SUPPORT_FLAG to some function with an assumed rank...
Regarding RTBuilder.h, it suffers an important flow which is that is assumes host and target architecture are the same, and that is why I would not polish it directly without...