jdwieland8282

This is an interesting proposal @pycnvr , when we conceived of the ID Import Library some found it more palatable to not allow the hashed email to be passed into...

@patmmccann no one is suggesting the id pmc would suppress contributions from the pub community! When we magnate built the id lib we weren’t asked to enable hashed emails in...

Hey @pycnvr what i've uncovered over the past few months is that publishers rarely run pb.js on their email capture pages because of this the id import lib rarely uncovers...

https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/issues/8311#issuecomment-1108765649 yes intuitively it makes sense that the lower the integer the shorter amount of time need elapse before triggering the function.

Thanks for sharing, so gpp-core needs an pub defined array of vendor endpoints where each endpoint is called when Data Deletion Request is received. I'm operating off this [spec](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dRxFUFmhh2jGanzGZvfkK_6jtHPpHXWD7Qsi6KEugeE/edit) which...

Ok, so summarizing the Identity PMC consensus. 1. The USP module will fire a deletion signal as an internal event to the User id sub adapters, when an asynchronous "delete"...

yes "shared id from local storage or cookie on that event". To be clear though, we expect the sub adapters to be listening for that event and do the necessary...

yes. Data deletion requests should persist.

@adtechnology In your original screenshot I don't see any cookies actually being set. The response header section lists: - cf - cip - cnac - car - gdpr - callback...

Thanks @smenzer. @adtechnology does that make sense? The call to id5-sync isn't happening from prebid. The initor is your SSP.