Javier Fernandez Garcia-Boente

Since this change touches both, 'resources' and 'tools' folders it'd required an RFC proposal to be discussed and approved. See https://github.com/web-platform-tests/rfcs/pull/121 for details.

@annevk who could be a good candidate to look at the [#33866 PR](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/33866) ? It's an automatic PR crated by the CL I m working on to add support in...

> Maybe @jgraham? To be clear, this is not a permission that is exposed to web content, right? Just Test Driver? Well, the [change](https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3613650) I'm doing in Chrome would indeed...

> That doesn't sound great? Where is the proposal for that permission as well as its standardization venue? This is still an idea, nothing has been landed yet. I'd appreciate...

I've created an [issue](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/7920) in the html spec to discuss the standardization of this new permission name.

I understand there is strong opposition to introduce a new permission for the Custom Handler spec, fair enough. Having said that, I'm still interested on pursuing what it was the...

If I've understood it correctly, @jgraham propose the definition of a new WebDrviver endpoint to handler the permission prompt. I also have understood that the ideal approach would be to...

Another approach, more in the line of the original idea to define a new WebDriver endpoint, would be to define an 'extension command' similar to what we have for the...

At lest @foolip expressed interest on defining a new WebDriver endpoint for the Custom Handlers, so that we could define some kind of autoreply on the prompt dialog and define...

Thanks for the review. See my comments inline.