Ivan Santiago Paunovic

force-pushed to solve conflicts

I have been doing some tests today, it seems to me that allowing the secondaries to make steps asynchronously is not of much benefit and the current performance bottleneck is...

[Last commit](https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-gazebo/pull/481/commits/04f8c3dc38d3b2620873a9acb968a060f87aff09) has the modified "distributed_levels" example I'm using for testing

@mjcarroll I have created some scripts that allows to run N robots in M secondaries, and it records stats using `ign_imgui`. Typical usage: ```bash #standalone cd ~/my_ws/src/ign-gazebo/examples/scripts/distributed_levels # Run with...

> I think that you may have posted the same image twice in your histogram analysis. Ups, corrected

> @ivanpauno looking at the commit/PR history, you are the one that added this global logging mutex. Is there something about this I'm not understanding that makes it necessary to...

I think the wording is correct but the image was never updated, right? The same seems to happen in [this section](https://docs.ros.org/en/foxy/Tutorials/Intra-Process-Communication.html?highlight=intra#pipeline-with-interprocess-viewer). > I would like to become a contributor. Please...

> I can make a PR, but please confirm me first my reasoning is ok. Yes, that's fine. > The same seems to happen in [this section](https://docs.ros.org/en/foxy/Tutorials/Intra-Process-Communication.html?highlight=intra#pipeline-with-interprocess-viewer). I think this...

> I'm open to suggestions for how to make this work, but my understanding is that the performance hit is unavoidable when converting from primitive types to their corresponding boxed...

> It would be convenient for users to be able to alter simulation properties through ROS parameters. What is the current way to alter simulation properties in ignition/ignition plugins? I'm...