ivangalkin

Hello @guwirth, I started to look into this user story by comparing of sonar-java and sonar-cxx. The sonar-java's implementation of `SonarSymbolTableVisitor` is easy, but it is based on the proper...

Hello @Bertk, thank you for the information. Regarding the EclipseCDT: I searched for the CUDA / C++CLI support and at least according to the screenshots they are properly highlighted. By...

Hello All, I was very interested in this feature and was able to implement the functionality with Eclipse CDT. Please take a look at #1479. The pull request contains implementation...

Hi @guwirth, @Bertk Hi All! thank you for your feedback! Although I see a big advantage of using of Eclipse CDT (or other mature 3rd party C/C++ parser) over the...

@guwirth > But I don't like to have two parsers in the plug-in. In case we change the parser we should switch completely. Maybe we could merge the eclipse CDT...

Hi @Bertk @jmecosta and @guwirth, Hi All, 1. regarding **clang**: I hear much positives from you about usage of clang with respect to the Sonar-CXX/SonarQube. I use clang by myself...

one more question w.r.t. clang 4. Technical implementation: I searched for the way to get AST from clang to java and haven't find anything satisfying. JNI bridges (if exist) require...

@jmecosta extracting checks and highlighting to C++ component means almost a re-implementation of the whole plugin from scratch IMHO. The only benefits you'll have are... `+` highlighting and symbol table...

@guwirth the existing metrics are different; * some of them do not require the AST at all (`FILES`, `LINES`, `LINES_OF_CODE`, `COMMENT_LINES`), maybe at most a lexer. What I know for...

Just for the sake of accuracy: CDT adds 10 MB (25 MB vs 15 MB). This might sound gigantic if you measure the diff in percentage (+66%), but for the...