Gabriel F. T. Gomes
Gabriel F. T. Gomes
Maybe that would be more inline with what other completions currently do, for instance, suggestion of perl modules after `perl -M`. On the other hand, I feel like that is...
Now with a test case (I think I finally understood how the test suite works)
I have updated this branch against current master and fixed the conflicts. I think the test case failures are unrelated to this patch.
Hi, @scop, Is there anything with this pull request that you believe should be changed? I'll happily write a new version, if so. PS: I have just rebased the patches...
Do you have any plans to release it still in 2018? That would be nice from a Debian perspective, because I could probably make it ready for the Buster release...
There's little activity, yes, but I wouldn't say it's dead, no. I'm the maintainer of the package in Debian and I try to reply to and fix the rare bugs...
Hi, is there any way I could help with this? I'm a noob, but I'd like to help.
> I think I have a related branch in my fork repository. Do you think this is fixed by [409ec8a](https://github.com/scop/bash-completion/commit/409ec8a7088d1c4d989b467e56acd903b43fb6a2)? I doesn't. Also, it looks like this commit breaks another...
> OK, thanks for trying. I haven't actually tested that branch. I'll later take a look at it. You're very welcome. By the way, I did not test a branch......
The branch has the same issue