Ivan Nardini
Ivan Nardini
Ready to be reviewed. Notice that the PR consider two files even if `build_model_experimentation_lineage_with_prebuild_code.ipynb` is the one to update. For some reason the linter code consider both of files when...
Ready to be reviewed
@andrewferlitsch ready to be merged
Ready to be reviewed. As [this PR](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/vertex-ai-samples/pull/853), the linter code modifies both this notebook and the `comparing_local_trained_models.ipynb`. Any ideas?
Hi @andrewferlitsch, as I mentioned above, the linter modifies both `comparing_pipeline_runs` and the `comparing_local_trained_models` notebooks. But the one to review is only the 1st one. I will resolve all your...
Ready to be merged
Thanks for the feedback. @ivanmkc I will open a PR to update the notebook accordingly.
Thanks for feedback. Point by Point: - I'm setting `InputCols` below the code: ` one_hot_encoder = OneHotEncoder(dropLast=False, inputCols=categorical_imputer.getOutputCols(), outputCols=ONE_HOT_ENCODED_FEATURES, handleInvalid='keep') ` - Yep, it is expected. But basically are you...
I get the Invite Invalid screen as well
This is going to be address here #3131 . Thanks