Ifeanyi Ubah

@LiangliangGuo Check out this link for setting up EGL properly https://github.com/vispy/vispy/issues/1848#issuecomment-613945544 There are a few issues with the EGL backend e.g it still leaves a dependency on a display server...

Hi @lgrignon! we ended up not leveraging JSweet for our project so I haven't used it since. I'm not able to commit to fixing this bug due to other priorities...

Hi, just wanted to leave some findings here after we've tried testing this PR out on windows. Unfortunately, we're still unable to get the rule to work on windows: -...

> @iffyio I definitely need to do more testing on windows. This is only a first step towards adding support for other platforms. As a test, could you let me...

Ah, not exactly if I understood the PR correctly. The goal with this was to remember what endpoint we chose for a client so e.g if the order of endpoints...

We can't close this yet #381 doesn't resolve it, the idea with this is that if the lb selects an upstream `A` for a client, all packets from that client...

Ah, so to clarify this ticket isn't specific to hashing in any way, its for all lb policies we'll have. It'll be wasteful to sort the list on each packet...

Yeah I think that would be easier with the new lb policy since it won't need to worry include its own cache.

Is it weird for a proxy binary to have a test command (are there any tools/systems that do something similar)? with `quilkin test` it feels that way to me but...

I see, but `nginx -t` isn't similar to what's being proposed with `quilkin test`? that only checks that the config is valid (which quilkin already always does). My understanding is...