Iden Kalemaj
Iden Kalemaj
Thanks again for reporting this. The issue has now been fixed.
Hi there, I have a few clarifying questions: - Are the guarantees you would like to offer "local differential privacy" or "central differential privacy"? I.e. are you trying to offer...
Hi @ParthS007, thank you for suggesting this feature. We recommend implementing it as part of the [research](https://github.com/meta-pytorch/opacus/tree/main/research) folder. The goal of the research folder is to provide implementation of new...
Closing this issue due to inactivity, feel free to reopen.
Thank you for pointing this out! Let me take a look and launch a fix.
@evgri243 thank you for this heavy-lifting change. I will take some time to digest and also discuss internally with the team. In the meanwhile I have some questions for you:...
Thank you for these explanations. I like your solution and have also experienced some annoyances with accessing attributes of the model post-wrapping. I also understand the use case better now....
That's a good point... let me know how it's looking once you work on it.
Hi @evgri243, apologies for the delayed response. I like how the integration has improved with the new version. I have some small recommendations about naming: - In privacy_engine, rename the...
@evgri243 and @david-stan, thank you for these changes, and for the hard work on improving the functionality. I like the idea of splitting the hooks handling from the model wrapping...