Vincent De Oliveira
Vincent De Oliveira
@danielgruber: I personnally add this unit (and also `%` and `rem`) when adapting this module for [pleeease-filters](https://github.com/iamvdo/pleeease-filters) (with no options for now, that means `1em` fallbacks to `16px`). You can...
You can use Pleeease playground (recently new feature added!) ;) http://pleeease.io/playground.html?div%20%7B%0A%20%20filter:%20blur(4px)%0A%7D
We have a test for that and it works as you expect https://github.com/robwierzbowski/node-pixrem/blob/master/test/test.js#L247-L252 So, your problem might be elsewhere ?
Maybe your problem is related to #38 ?
@MoOx : It could be great indeed.
@joaocunha Not in the roadmap, but I hear about this approach. You're not alone. :) I think it's better to have 2 modules, but what is your thought ? A...
I knew this tool, but as I said before, the size is not the main criterion. Your benchmark is much more important to compare minifiers I just wanted to add...
Hello @wopian, and thanks for that. I was aware that rectangles are not supported by the current algorithm. Your solution is very clever, and there is no reason to not...
>Possibly using a 2nd CSS variable to change the mode which would switch between 1 superellipse and 4 superellipses (quarter of one on each corner) or separate as 2 paint...
I'm also not sure about expected result, but try the `rebaseUrls` option maybe ?