huiwq1990
huiwq1990
@FabianKramm Hi, does this issue have progress, is there plan to support it ?
@windydayc I think it's not a good idea to maintian the cni binaries in openyurt repo, could you explain the reason? I recommend: 1) the binaries directly download from https://github.com/containernetworking/plugins/releases/...
> @huiwq1990 Maybe we can discuss this issue in the next community meeting. Ok, I will attend a meeting.
@gnunu @rambohe-ch I recommend the first one. As: 1) [kube-webhook-certgen](https://github.com/jet/kube-webhook-certgen) could patch k8s webhooks and generate certs for https server; 2) If we maintain the certs code, we need cover...
https://github.com/kubevela/kubevela/discussions/4490 @rambohe-ch @gnunu the project alreay maintian the webhook patch function, we can follow it.
Someone post the `admissionregistration/v1beta1` issue in https://github.com/jet/kube-webhook-certgen/issues/30 . `jet/kube-webhook-certgen` does not want to solve it and recommand use https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/tree/main/images/kube-webhook-certgen. So does we maintain the code ourself? @rambohe-ch @gnunu
Kubevela community invite us to share the proposal at July 12, 2022 Community Meeting. Do you have time for this meeting？ https://github.com/kubevela/kubevela/issues/4326
> It would be nice if you can comment on the community meeting agenda issue here [kubevela/community#34](https://github.com/kubevela/community/issues/34) so that you can share your proposal and we can discuss this in...
@wonderflow I think it works fine for deploy helm to a specific nodepool. If we want to deploy helm to all nodepools, did we should write override policy for all...