hossenlopp

Results 9 comments of hossenlopp

This is something thats now coming to fruition with more conversion of QDM measures to QICore. In QICore 4.1.1 [Communication.reasonCode.notDoneValueSet](http://hl7.org/fhir/us/qicore/StructureDefinition-qicore-communicationnotdone-definitions.html#Communication.reasonCode.extension:notDoneValueSet) and QICore 5.0.0 [Communication.topic.notDoneValueSet](http://hl7.org/fhir/us/qicore/STU5/StructureDefinition-qicore-communicationnotdone-definitions.html#key_Communication.topic.extension:notDoneValueSet) a url to a ValueSet may...

Hey @csenn! One of our projects does some shuffling through the ELM JSON outside of execution and I did some work to define types for that. It's a bit pared...

We have been looking at this same issue from the `fqm-execution` side of things. Our current plan to resolve this coverage issue is to calculate coverage by only using `localId`s...

Option 1 feels like the _right_ approach and we could suggest the measure developers to check the `unit` and `value` in CQL logic. But the intent of the comparison they...

Following up on some of these questions. 1. The capabilities response might make sense to ease some of the logic in the engine. But it would just be a set...

Hi @RohitKandimalla, Thanks for including all the data needed for us to debug this. We will prioritize looking at this in our upcoming sprint. Best, Chris

Hi @RohitKandimalla, It looks like the MeasureBundle here doesn't contain any FHIR Measure or Library resources and is not a FHIR Bundle. Could you upload a complete measure bundle to...

Hi @RohitKandimalla, As we were debugging various issues with ValueSets in the past few weeks, this issue made us aware that our internal ValueSet objects are coming through as statement...

We are closing this ticket as the original issue was not with the `cql-execution`. For tracking the ValueSet vocabulary type implementation we will use the existing ticket #226.