heykirby

I have some code optimizations that I hope can be merged into the main branch https://github.com/heykirby/ProtoJson/blob/simdkson/src/main/java/org/simdjson/SimdKsonParser.java

yes, it looks like simdjson has implemented this capability，thanks

@andyglow refer to #59 ,it works for us，and might work for you too

benchmark, simdjson2 vs jackson, performance is more than 6 times higher. if parsing less of json fields, the performance improvement is particularly obvious. [reference](https://github.com/heykirby/simdjson-java/blob/feature_simdjson2/src/jmh/java/org/simdjson/Parse2VsJacksonBenchMark.java) simdjson: 95.936 ops jackson: 15.833

@arouel thanks very much, I have fix the code based on your suggestion. In the case of determining the parsing path, simdjsonParserWithFixPath provides better performance and supports compressing map and...

> @heykirby I just want share some thoughts/questions: > > With some minor API changes in `simdjson-java`, could we keep the `SimdJsonParserWithFixPath` in another codebase or it could life in...

> How is this different from [On-Demand parsing](https://github.com/simdjson/simdjson/blob/master/doc/ondemand_design.md) available in the c++ simdjson version? > > I introduced a form of on-demand parsing in #51 (see: `org.simdjson.OnDemandJsonIterator`). The API requires...

> Hi, sorry for the delayed reply. > > @heykirby What I meant was that we can introduce on-demand parsing for a DOM-like API, which would significantly reduce the need...

@piotrrzysko I submitted a new PR, could you give me some guidance? https://github.com/simdjson/simdjson-java/pull/63