hexaheximal

This is actually a really good idea for multiplayer, since it would be inefficient to send the entire name over the network.

> How would you expect computerfairi.es Oddly specific :raised_eyebrow: > to verify that mastodon.social is telling the truth about what hexaheximal.com actually contains? This is a trick question - it...

> It was the only specific instance you mentioned in your post Directly yes, but I linked to https://mastodon.social/@hexaheximal/110646609935692698 as well where I posted a screenshot of the logs. >...

It looks like this can't actually be merged due to merge conflicts since breaking changes have been made since the previous commit on your branch. Can you try running `git...

> You mean literally resetting it to an earlier head, pulling and copy pasting my backed up stuff in there? Correct. That would be needed to properly fix the commit...

> Is this like, how you do it every time you do a pull request, or can I avoid it most of the time in the future? Again, I wanna...

I actually agree with tulip on this one. I hate dealing with Miniswig and SimpleSquirrel looks so much better. I am very concerned about how something like SimpleSquirrel would work...

I wrote the audio portability code with that goal in mind but never got around to doing the graphics part. Here's the problem though: SuperTux Advance utilizes A LOT of...

This pull request's implementation is fundamentally problematic. After reading it, I can think of a few issues off the top of my head: - The getAudioDriver() name change is incredibly...

> The getAudioDriver() name change was to make the function name generally make more sense as it felt fairly ambiguous. I guess that makes some sense. > What would the...