Marc Hennemann
Marc Hennemann
@EslamAsHhraf No actually what you're describing is another issue: #447 that shall prevent any `*` from beeing rendered and executed because it currently breaks the schema. This is issue is...
The issue is as pointed out by @dengjuan0721 that an * or other reserved keywords like already existing tables_names in that schema may break the entire schema. Therefore the input...
@Ahmed-Elgamel If this PR is not yet ready to be reviewed please mark it as WIP or Draft, thanks.
@Ahmed-Elgamel Regarding the remaining sources you should first focus on the AbstarctJdbc ones first.However I'm not sure if its sufficient to only implement it there alone. Since every system is...
Hi @alyaa999 What do you mean by 'in a sperate endpoint'?
@alyaa999 Ah okay I get the question now, thanks for clarifying. Yes indeed a separate method(s) would be desirable since adapters and inetrfaces are not part of any schema 👍
Hi @Ahmed-Elgamel I've assigned the issue to you.
Hi @stone-sgy thanks for your interest in Polypheny. Yes indeed I can confirm that we support Cross-Model Queries, this is one of our major goals to provide a semntical layer...
Moved discussion from #454 here.
Hi @ritikBhandari, sadly that issue is somewhat ill-defined and quite extenssive in terms of workload. It does not only revolve around the issue mentioned in the issue itself, but really...