hdid comments

Results 7 comments of


                                            hdid

Feature socks udp associate

I tested it and works well. Please merge this asap 👍 [chisel-socks-udp-1.7.6-linux_amd64.gz](https://github.com/jpillora/chisel/files/6560565/chisel-socks-udp-1.7.6-linux_amd64.gz)

1.5.10版本UOT失效（UDP over TCP）

for me just [v1.5.8](https://github.com/XTLS/Xray-core/releases/tag/v1.5.8) works. next versions do not work with _"uot": true_

1.5.10版本UOT失效（UDP over TCP）

> > xray 1.6.1服务端，clash.meta 1.13.1客户端，ss+ws uot正常 > > 更新：使用Android clash.meta客户端确实发现xray1.6.1有问题，换成1.5.9正常，但Windows上1.6.1无问题 > > 那看起来是linux端的问题？（我瞎说的，反正没人修… yeah i'm using debian os.

1.5.10版本UOT失效（UDP over TCP）

@yuhan6665 @database64128 maybe you can help...

> @hdid UoT is not part of the Shadowsocks 2022 protocol. > > Related discussions: [shadowsocks/shadowsocks-rust#834](https://github.com/shadowsocks/shadowsocks-rust/issues/834) @database64128 what about this https://github.com/XTLS/Xray-core/commit/c3505632fd7e10bfd0f63b19b8a74223a6a2514b ?

Ram usage growing up with faketcp protocol

``` # free -m total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 1973 1029 482 8 462 784 Swap: 2047 0 2047 ``` ``` # ps_mem Private + Shared = RAM...

Iran's regime seems to have fully blocked WireGuard

WireGuard with obfuscation support #88