harefb

We agree that by using an alpha-numeric IRI similar to BFO we increasing the ability for an international adoption of the standard. This is important from a DoD perspective when...

The DICO team likes the above outlined approach outlined by Mark and Brian and Neil's recommendation for how the community might be able to better share lessons learned and tips...

The ONTOP mapping interface does pull from the IRIs (everything after the “/” or “#”). I do not think you can configure it to render labels in the mapping interface....

DIA/SAIC team agrees with revised motion. If the terms all still have the English language labels, I think we could just make our own two-column CSV files for the cheat...

I will attempt to simplify this issue tremendously. 1. An international standard should be language agnostic. Imagine if the CCO had been developed by the Ethiopians. Whether it were written...

We concur with Alan. In the defense intelligence core ontology, we treat target as a role that someone designates an entity of interest.

The DICO definition for TARGET ROLE will be something like this: A Role that inheres in an Agent, or other material entity, by virtue of that entity having been considered...

I’m honestly not sure I understand all the below, but I did key in on one point- I agree that the two views of target as being a role and...

@bdonohue29 you make a great point regarding the entity TARGET. In fact, we do actually use the term TARGET ROLE in DICO so I have updated this thread accordingly. Additionally,...

My responses after “>>” Agree that addition of Target Role is the correct solution. And it is consistent with our recent additions of Part Role and System Role. >> noted....