Hal Martin

I appreciate your efforts here, but there are some major changes in this PR which I am not willing to accept - You removed support for the MX80 - The...

@hall Some kind of CICD would be nice, although given how long `buildroot` takes to build, I'm not sure if there are inexpensive options to accomplish this. Another reason I'm...

> is there some specific software that could be supported or would running docker on device be a possibility. There is no support for Docker, nor will there be as...

Buildroot offers several options for web servers, including lighthttpd instead of uhttpd is possible. > (5mb is enough for a static site but you need something to execute your commands)...

> Is it possible to extract an image from one of these devices (just an vmdk equivalent?). Yes and no. If you want similar user space, you can use buildroot...

> I'm gonna try building it using Leo's Notes Leo's approach is an entirely different firmware which utilizes Meraki's binaries for switch management (notably, `switch_brain` and `libpoecore`). I have [written...

@randlor it's a bit more complex on the MS42, as the SOIC flash is underneath the PCB, requiring you to remove the PCB from the chassis to access the chip....

I have written a small, terrible shell script to print the current status of the switch ports as JSON: [switch_status](https://github.com/halmartin/meraki-builder/blob/master/buildroot/board/meraki/ms200/overlay/bin/switch_status) Here is what the output looks like on my MS220-8P...

Good suggestions, I've implemented the following changes: ``` { "device": "meraki_MS220-8P", "date": "2020-12-05T13:24:05Z", "temperature": "43.9 C", "ports": [ { "port": 1, "link": { "established": true, "speed": 1000 }, "lacp": false,...

I tried to build the UI following the instructions in the repo, but I got the following error: ``` Step 1/7 : FROM node:17-alpine ---> d0ea4d2aa898 Step 2/7 : RUN...