Greg Lazarev

[Facade](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facade_pattern) is a well-established pattern. I think the word sounding negative is a weak argument (it's an analogy to (architectural facade](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facade)). `include Draper::ViewHelpers` instead of this, it would be useful...

Might be worth taking a look at [focused_controller](https://github.com/jonleighton/focused_controller) gem.

I have not used it (or know of anyone that has). I remember reading about it a while back, and your proposal stirred that memory. Here's a [blog post](http://www.jonathanleighton.com/articles/2012/explaining-focused-controller/) from...

Service Object is not a variation of a Presenter technique. They are two different things. Presenter helps out with the presentation layer, while Service layer acts as an intermediary between...

Under "Disadvantages", points 2 and 3 are actually alternatives -- not really disadvantages. You might want to mention that another disadvantage is, it could be argued, that Concerns hide the...

Another thing worth mentioning is trickiness involved when testing Concerns that are included into several models. Do you test each model for those included methods? Do you create a dummy...

We'd love to add this. We're planning to roll-out support for some simple, and most common, corrections first, where the linter allows it.

@cclauss Any idea if `3.7.4` is backwards compatible? Would there any breakage if we upgrade the default to `3.7.4` vs providing `3.7.4` as an opt-in upgrade?

There currently isn't. Any specific SQL linters to recommend?

https://github.com/joereynolds/sql-lint looks promising.