Brian Gunney
Brian Gunney
Sorry for the late response. Yes, I think if you support wait_some and test_some **AND** std::list as the primary interface for passing data, it would be what we need.
It may be possible that I want to have the completed requests around for some reason, although I probably don't care about the out_indices. What do you think of moving...
I'm also interested in this issue. I use the TimeLord to get the TimeConverter used by the Simulator. I see that it has moved to Simulator_impl, but there's not public...
Yes, they're sufficient. Thank you.
Thanks @bmhan12
In the summary, can you briefly say if this this change lets us do something we couldn't do before? Or maybe whether it only streamlines, slimplify, whatever..., something we can...
@cyrush Very sorry for taking so long. After calling `execute`, how would I determine which non-blocking operation completed?
@cyrush Just getting back to this. I'm still interested in this feature. I'd like to be able to specify whether I'm willing to wait for at least one to finish...
This was handled by PR https://github.com/LLNL/axom/pull/921, as @kennyweiss mentioned. Closing.
Some new observations: 1. Based on @white238's guess, I disabled MPI (and MFEM, which was configured with MPI) from the failing config. This fixed the failure. Not exactly sure what...