Gerjan Stokkink

To reproduce: define a group with a | character in its name, and activate the group for a feature that has some additional data. Next, check whether the feature is...

Re-use buffer after opening blame commit to prevent polluting the jumplist?

1

First of all, nice plugin! It seems to replace both vim-fugitive and vim-rhubarb. I noticed a small issue after opening a blame commit (original mapping: ``). In vim-fugitive, I could...

### Please tick this box to confirm you have reviewed the above. - [X] I have a different issue. ### What version of ripgrep are you using? ``` ripgrep 14.1.0...

`null_indexes` query breaks when logical replication is enabled

5

Hi, First of all, thanks for your hard work on this excellent gem! We are having issues when trying to run the `null_indexes` query (or `index_info`, which uses this query...

Rate limiting does not reset between tests

3

Recently we decided to implement the new rate limiting introduced in Rails 7.2 into several of our controllers. However, we quickly noticed that controller tests started failing with the `429...

Is this version lock still required? Rails 8 has been out for a while :)

https://github.com/hartmut-co-uk/pg-repack-docker/pull/9 @hartmut-co-uk FYI, would appreciate a merge & release 😄 Thanks for the hard work!

Allow Brakeman to determine the Rails configuration by querying `Rails.application.config`

2

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** We have a bunch of Rails applications in a single repository (i.e., a monorepo). These Rails applications share a lot...

Allow `--only-files` et al. to function with 'leading dot' notation for files

2

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** The following works fine: `bundle exec brakeman --only-files foo,bar` The following does not: `bundle exec brakeman --only-files ./foo,./bar` The files...

Undercover takes files into consideration that it shouldn't based on the coverage

6

Hi, We tried upgrading from undercover 0.5 to 0.6+ a while ago, and noticed that our undercover checks started breaking. The reason is that the following check was removed in...