Jason Pollentier
Jason Pollentier
Hey, @29decibel thanks for filing the issue and PR, and sorry it's been sitting here so long without attention. If you're still interested in moving this forward, I'd be interested...
@utopos I'm going to close this under the understanding that the `binary: true` option solves your needs. If that's not the case, please let me know!
@sunny-g I noticed this PR uses version `0.2.0` of your XDR package, but I don't see it on [hex.pm](https://hex.pm/packages/xdr). Can we expect that to be updated soon?
@sunny-g No worries at all, I appreciate your making the XDR package and helping us out with this project! I agree with your desire not to a package with github...
I'm a bit skeptical about investing further in Pow, because there's a pretty high learning curve once you step off the beaten path and need to customize something. I've seen...
I just realized something about this: - `releases.exs` is only used for built releases - `runtime.exs` is evaluated at runtime for _all environments_ meaning it includes test and dev as...
We took a poll at the engineering meeting and decided this stuff isn't adding enough value to keep maintaining it. We should remove it. I'll update the issue description.
@LeakyBucket I think you've put your finger on (and helped me to see) the crux. In order to support subqueries, [this change](https://github.com/revelrylabs/ecto_soft_delete/pull/141/files#diff-ca34acdc9ce0abc3a0e75ccd339bf40656db950047754464747c88b4c8ce62f8R34-R45) got us into the business of recursing down...
Thanks for the report @caioaao! I've been able to confirm this bug [here](https://github.com/revelrylabs/ecto_soft_delete/pull/186), and I do believe the problem was introduced in #141 as you say.
Thanks for the heads-up and the fix @nilsojes ! @Samkeer1 @quinnmccourt do you recall whether we really need anything higher than Elixir 1.9? I know we updated to `import Config`...