Greg Whitworth

@Gidgidonihah Can you please open a separate issue with more specifics, which version, repro of the issue, etc. Thanks.

Not entirely sure why that's funny, we're doing the layout to get the correct size of the flex main and cross axis dimensions to shrink wrap around, Chrome/FF are not....

Looking at it, this is slightly similar to the unfortunate `min-height` [issue](https://github.com/philipwalton/flexbugs#3-min-height-on-a-flex-container-wont-apply-to-its-flex-items) and results in needing to use explicit without allowing for auto. I'll assign to myself to write up...

I'll need to look into it a little bit because this merge has more to do with how the content measuring is done in each engine. Edge is the only...

I think this works at this point, but I don't think this will work once Chrome updates to the new part of the [spec regarding absolute](http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#flex-wrap-property) positioned children. I will...

That's a good one, have you opened a bug against Blink? Interestingly, if it's within the same declaration it works as expected: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/bNmjGV, seems like it's failing to look up...

Yeah, I messed around with initial a little bit at first to get the depth of Chrome's issue, but initial is not supported in IE unfortunately. So if we want...

> Perhaps the best approach is to move ahead with specifying just the parts that are required for each control, and see how far that goes. 100% agree. I'd like...

Sorry for the delay on this and thank you for taking the time @vansosnin You have changed the name computation by putting the `img` within the `` which removes the...

Just to be clear, this is an author requirement, not an implementation requirement as the implementation default is to utilize `100vw` within sizes, even if it is not declared. That...