Joseph Bulbulia comments

Results 9 comments of


                                            Joseph Bulbulia

Support new models

Thanks Vincent and contributors to this thread. As food for thought, consider Westreich and colleagues 2015 paper: [https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/44/5/1731/2594566?login=false](https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/44/5/1731/2594566?login=false) Ignore that the authors compare a very specific multiple imputation approach for...

Support new models

Thanks for replying Vincent. I share your intuitions! However, when it comes to causal inference, I find my intuitions sometimes lead me astray. Additionally, Westreich is one of the most...

Improve coordinates api

@vincentarelbundock this is a helpful suggestion. Thank you.

Remove use of "significant" from automative reporting.

Suggest replacing "significant" with "reliable."

Remove use of "significant" from automative reporting.

Or "statistically significant" or "statistically reliable." Also, I'm not sure the passive formulation has been fixed by "can be considered significant" is vague (who considers? significant in what way?). I'd...

Remove use of "significant" from automative reporting.

You guys are doing great work. Just getting all the results coming out as text is a huge time saver. BRMS or MCMCglmm integration would be nice one day, but...

Remove use of "significant" from automative reporting.

Wahoo, thanks Daniel!

new vignette showing end-to-end use of `easystats` packages in a paper

I'm presently teaching a university honours-level course on R in psychological science; I have our students using easystats packages (and ggeffects) for there analyses and reports. A resource of the...

Times series data

Awesome, you folks are great -- really grateful for all your work here -- thank you!