giobetti

Hi Jose, thanks for the feedback. What would be the use case/practical application? Currently there are a few assumptions that we had to bake in the chart: For a “generic”...

Hi Federico, Thanks for the explanation. Reading your comments was as well thinking that the right place seems to be the natural ventilation tab. Would this be 2 new graphs...

Hi Federico, lots of good comments here I'll try to think how this might look like once we put all together. In the meanwhile I was l looking at the...

Hi Federico, So I guess we are thinking about a complete overhaul of the Nat vent tab. This is what I think makes sense, please let me know what you...

I think we should always have a comfort zone displayed (even if technically it is outside of the standards) On 8. Jun 2022, at 03:00, Federico Tartarini ***@***.***> wrote: ...

Thanks Federico, I think you are on top of this! I'll go through your paper and see if there is a way to integrate the two methods. What is the...

Hi, this is something Federico and I have been discussing a LOT and have started doing some steps in this direction. I believe the inclusion of future weather files would...

The climate change models are huge. The morph files are small because the morphing is applied on a monthly base. So the idea would be to pre-generate the morphing files,...

Hi Federico, Thanks for this, what do you mean too narrow bands? The bins are 1 deg and some 0,004 absolute humidity. I guess that the issue in the case...

There is no “default” chart size. Currently the height is fixed and the width resizes with the browser, so it is easy to have a more square appearance.