Giacomo Cavalieri
Giacomo Cavalieri
I don't know how hard it would be to use the type names chosen by the package author but I can try changing it, if that's desired!
What should the generated code look like instead?
Thanks for the clarification!
I think this can be closed now!
> #340 got merged but I still want to add some more tests for at least string, string_builder, interator and maybe map modules, I think. @inoas have you written any...
If this is still up for grabs, I'd love to try implementing it!
Hello! I remember feeling the need for something similar in the past, I called it `break_ties`, you can achieve something similar using `bool.guard`: ```gleam fn compare_cat2(a: Cat, b: Cat) ->...
I think it'd be easier to use one that works directly with an order: ```gleam pub fn break_tie(in order: Order, with comparison: Order) -> Order { case order { Lt...
Nice catch! I'll open a separate issue for that
Mmh would that work even if I wrote the code like this? `# ( 1,2 )` (notice the space between the hashtag and the open parentheses) because technically that's a...