Gert Hengeveld
Gert Hengeveld
@tmeasday @shilman I'd like to get your 👍 on the decision to pass `step` on the play function's `context` argument. This way we make it a core part of the...
> Hmm, I'm not sure we want to add that dependency. I wonder if we should have a (basically hidden) mechanism where addons can add fields to the story/play context?...
> * We'll add an undocumented preset export `step` that ends up on the `projectAnnotations`, defaulting to `f => f()` What happens if someone sets up another addon which exports...
@wKich this might be of interest to you.
This should be rebased off `future/base`
@tmeasday is to make some changes to inject `step` into the `playContext` without having a dependency on `instrumenter`.
The debugger seems broken right now. Need to investigate.
@shilman This is good to go. Not sure what's up with cra-bench, seems like a Playwright or config issue unrelated to this PR.
If we are going to do this, please include a config option to use the old root ID (e.g. `legacyRootElement: true`) so that people who rely on it (e.g. for...
I'm seriously in doubt whether we should want to do this at all. Going to be a painful transition, most likely.