Antti Moelsae comments

Results 8 comments of


                                            Antti Moelsae

Validate mutations of model fields, e.g. appending to a list field

@sydney-runkle This seems like an interesting problem and a useful feature, would be interested in working on this. I can think of a solution where `BaseModel` is extended s.t. any...

Validate mutations of model fields, e.g. appending to a list field

@alexmojaki [this](https://gist.github.com/geospackle/8f317fc19469b1e216edee3cc0f1c898) should address your comments

Validate mutations of model fields, e.g. appending to a list field

Bummer. Learnt a lot tinkering around with this though! I will leave [this gist](https://gist.github.com/geospackle/8f317fc19469b1e216edee3cc0f1c898) up for anyone who stumbles here to implement themselves the rest of the way if they...

Add support for dt.timezone/dt.tzinfo objects as types in pydantic models.

This looks interesting. Regarding validation from JSON, I can think of doing it with `pytz`, but we would rather have that logic in `pydantic_core` and validate against a list of...

Add support for dt.timezone/dt.tzinfo objects as types in pydantic models.

@davidhewitt Unsure what the interaction with `pydantic_core.TzInfo` could be if implemented in Python. Anything specific we need to look out for here? If implemented in `pydantic_core` I am thinking of...

Add support for dt.timezone/dt.tzinfo objects as types in pydantic models.

@sydney-runkle Unclear to me if I should proceed with this.

Add support for dt.timezone/dt.tzinfo objects as types in pydantic models.

> I think it would be difficult to interact with `pydantic_core.TzInfo` from Python, so this may need to be `pydantic_core`. Makes sense. I started tinkering with this and hoping to...

Add support for dt.timezone/dt.tzinfo objects as types in pydantic models.

This change requires more extensive work than I expected and looks like I am not able to dedicate the time needed. It was great to learn the code base a...