Christopher Haster

Sorry about the delay between CI jobs, the new "workflow approval for first time contributors" requirement means I need to manually allow the CI to run, which I unfortunately probably...

> I'm assuming not since I don't think lfs_dir_split(...) touchs lfs_fs_preporphans(...) at all. Ah, lfs_dir_split is a bit special. Orphans are metadata-pairs that no longer belong to a directory, and...

It looks like the branch doesn't work, I'm guessing it needs to be on master since this is what GitHub uses to update the [contributors graph](https://github.com/littlefs-project/littlefs/graphs/contributors). https://github.com/littlefs-project/littlefs/tree/tim-nordell-nimbelink-perm Unfortunately they really...

So, I have been sitting on this PR for a while because I've been unsure if it should go in or not. It is a really nice feature leveraging some...

Hi @opilat, thanks for creating a PR. I'm not sure I really see the value of this warning, at least for littlefs, and it doesn't seem to be present in...

> The proposed change is more defensive code style and still worth of merge. What if /lfs_gstate_hasorphans/ changes its return value? I'm less concerned with the current code and more...

Seconding @e107steved on this, best to try it and see what happens. It's quite an interesting question, but I don't see why it wouldn't work. The only thing that would...

Hi @monowii, thanks for the PR. Do you think this should actually be ``` https://os.mbed.com/docs/mbed-os/latest/apis/littlefilesystem.html ``` to avoid needing to keep updating the link?

Hi @XinStellaris, sorry about the late response. Thanks for creating a PR. This is a bit of a puzzle, the fix seems obvious but I'm hesitant to accept it. I'm...

Hi @Magamanny thanks for creating an issue and sorry for the late response. That's quite a funny paradox you have there. Writing the logs to littlefs itself is reasonable, but...