garpinc

1) yes.. I added the pk2 in a later iteration. I updated the rdf to reflect matching rdf 2) Changing it to xsd:integer worked... So awesome but why wouldn't xsd:int...

I'm not fully understanding 3.. Is it a bug in jsonld or in my context? ``` { "@context": { "owl" : "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#", "xsd" : "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#", "rdfs" : "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#", "metaframe" :...

I fixed above so that ``` { a , ; "6"^^ . a , ; "6"^^ . a , , ; , . } ``` now gives ``` { "@context"...

Is this a duplicate then? https://github.com/jsonld-java/jsonld-java/issues/313 Because I want that last thing but somehow i can't seem to get that... Can you? Or is what you are describing where jena...

This would be a great addition.. an equalizer of sorts.. since common people don't know how to write rdf if they could just add stuff in excel, output in csv...

I agree with you. In my case ahead of time I decided on the types I wanted to use since I have the ability to control that. Other people might...

I understand that. I'm just saying that some customers of yours might want the users verified as per the normal keycloak. Since ur already optionally getting their groups I'm sure...

+1

I'm actually doing embedded keycloak in our app derived from https://www.baeldung.com/keycloak-embedded-in-spring-boot-app. Everything works as is but not this usecase which we were hoping for as one of our customers requires...

Is there any chance of you adding the oracle support to 21? ________________________________ From: Pascal Knüppel ***@***.***> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 1:34 PM To: Captain-P-Goldfish/scim-for-keycloak ***@***.***> Cc: garpinc ***@***.***>;...