George Vlahavas

Same problem here. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a new extension 2. Use web-ext to sign it 3. Delete the extension from DevHub 4. Create a new version of the...

Hi @kumar303 , yes they are accurate. Thanks!

Mine has only unlisted versions. To be exact, it only has one unlisted version. There is no "Listing visibility" section in the "Manage Status & Versions" page that I can...

Unfortunately, I can still reproduce the problem.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean. There are full source code repositories for each one of the package repositories I mentioned, e.g.: https://download.salixos.org/x86_64/15.0/source/ In any case, if your...

What do you mean by "upstream"? Do you mean each package's respective homepage? For example https://www.libreoffice.org/ for libreoffice and a download for the source tarball in libreoffice's servers? What would...

For **most** (but not all) packages, it would be possible to do that. For example, for the libreoffice scripts linked in the previous post, the SLKBUILD file includes the line:...

What you request is impossible. I suggest that you remove the Salix repositories from repology as they are misleading as they are. Additionally, you should probably also remove Slackware repositories,...

I **am** the lead Salix developer. It is impossible to add the information you request. I can also guarantee you that Pat Volkerding will not change the Slackware repository structure...

No, it won't, as PACKAGES.json (or the respective PACKAGES.TXT files) is not meant for that purpose. There are things that would potentially break if additional fileds were to be included....